Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 263 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ideas on helping grow NJ State series #51516
    tpbmxtd
    Member

    @bmiddaugh wrote:

    It’s my personal belief that propagating new riders should be dependant upon each individual track.

    You are right Sir, the tracks have to also step up and try and bring in local riders.

    in reply to: Ideas on helping grow NJ State series #51504
    tpbmxtd
    Member

    Maybe make the qualifying rounds worth less points and the championship worth more to make the racing at the championship race more exciting.

    Also make the State flyer’s more appealing. Brighter colors and make it stand out more.

    Lower the amount of qualifiers and locals needed to qualify for a state plate.

    Allow riders to race the championship race even if they are not qualified. Not race in an open, but race in class, just do not point them.

    I will post more……

    in reply to: Banquet? #51334
    tpbmxtd
    Member

    @CrazyCraig wrote:

    We are looking at possibly the weekend before Thanksgiving. BUT, this is not definite yet.

    Craig before any date is made for the banquet, I wanted to let you know that we have our last race of the season on that Saturday.

    in reply to: dirt turns #51167
    tpbmxtd
    Member

    @guinnessextreme wrote:

    Well said Pinky… Trilogy is a beautiful facility, but you might as well concrete the whole thing.

    We are working on that for next year……. 🙄

    in reply to: dirt turns #51141
    tpbmxtd
    Member

    @TenaciousD wrote:

    …but if it rains how slick would it be ?

    Ever try and ride your bike on a frozen pond?

    On a turn I wouldn’t suggest riding on it when its wet.

    in reply to: Younger Riders. #51091
    tpbmxtd
    Member

    While we think this is a good idea, it takes alot of time and energy to run one series let alone 2. The idea behind the Pro/Am series was to keep the older riders involved in the sport and give the younger riders a chance to see some good racing.

    in reply to: Pro/Am warm up #51090
    tpbmxtd
    Member

    This is something we can look into for next year

    in reply to: It’s been a good month for Pt. Pleasant Bicycles #51086
    tpbmxtd
    Member

    You forgot little Vinnie on page 47………..

    in reply to: Thanks for a great opening year. #51078
    tpbmxtd
    Member

    Yes, thanks

    in reply to: 2007 BS.net Hans Stirley Award #51074
    tpbmxtd
    Member

    ok…ok, just settle down tuff guy.

    <—- still like my avatar

    in reply to: 2007 BS.net Hans Stirley Award #51072
    tpbmxtd
    Member

    @bmiddaugh wrote:

    ….or are you busting Rich’s balls Glen? LOL…..

    Not busting balls….when is the last time you saw Rich on a BMX track?

    He fits your criteria of someone who has done something for all the tracks and has not been paid.

    So anyone who rode a bike around a track would be considered a rider than, right.

    Can you be sure that the person you pick hadn’t raced at one time or another 😛

    in reply to: 2007 BS.net Hans Stirley Award #51067
    tpbmxtd
    Member

    I have a nomination for the male award…….Rich Carolan

    in reply to: Hyper Pro/Am Input….. #51064
    tpbmxtd
    Member

    We want to get the riders input, but also the spectators input. So I don’t want to lock it down to just riders.

    in reply to: team results #51022
    tpbmxtd
    Member

    @RFarside wrote:

    I think its time for some changes.

    Rich is correct……things have to change.

    in reply to: Pro AM info #50991
    tpbmxtd
    Member

    @s4lnj wrote:

    not trying to be a jerk– but bensalem is closing correct?– what’s all this talk about rules?– everyone show up, run what ya brung, have a blast.

    of course it’s not my gig, just my opinion

    dave

    Understand that they are closing but I am sure that they still have to worry about insurance for the race or they wouldn’t have to worry about the one day trials.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 263 total)